*69 Gel Eyeliner

The Morphe M2 Always Online Gel Liner closely mirrors the af94 *69, making it an excellent dupe. Both formulations contain Trimethylsiloxysilicate, a silicone polymer essential for waterproof, long-wearing properties, ensuring minimal smudging. Additionally, the presence of Isododecane in both acts as a fast-drying solvent and excellent film-former, contributing to their smooth application and impressive longevity. This shared core chemistry provides a near-identical performance profile for precise, resilient lines.

While the formulations are almost identical, some users might find the af94 original to have a slightly creamier glide, potentially due to a minute variation in binder concentration not captured in a simple ingredient list. For those who prioritize the absolute smoothest application for intricate work and are willing to pay the slight premium for that tactile difference, the af94 *69 remains the top choice, despite the Morphe being a truly outstanding, affordable alternative.

The Alamar Cosmetics Conga Liner Duo stands as a robust dupe for the af94 *69 Gel Eyeliner due to their striking ingredient commonalities. Both formulas leverage Dimethicone to provide a smooth, emollient glide during application and enhance waterproof properties, crucial for a long-wearing liner. Cyclopentasiloxane, also present in both, ensures a silky, non-greasy feel and rapid drying time, contributing to a smudge-proof finish. This shared silicone-heavy base establishes a strong functional resemblance between the two.

While the ingredient lists align closely, the packaging and overall experience differ. The af94 offers a single pencil, suggesting a more straightforward application. The Alamar, as a duo, likely provides more versatility in shades or finishes, potentially including a liquid and pencil option for different effects. Consumers prioritizing simplicity, or who are loyal to a single, specific shade from af94, may still opt for the original despite the Alamar's comparable formulation.

You can confidently consider Collection Cosmetics' Fast Stroke a viable alternative to af94's *69 Gel Eyeliner. Both formulations achieve a smooth, gliding application and long-wear performance due to shared ingredients like Isododecane, a volatile solvent that ensures quick drying and smudge resistance, and Trimethylsiloxysilicate, a film-former that locks the pigment in place for extended wear without fading.

While the core functionality is similar, the Collection liner likely offers a slightly less intense, true gel-like finish compared to the af94 original, which is known for its exceptionally creamy and opaque color payoff. If you prioritize that ultra-pigmented, almost lacquer-like appearance and don't mind a marginally higher price point, the af94 is still the superior choice for that specific aesthetic.